One person’s value is another person’s ROI.
What does this mean?
When you're a company your value is in how well your products and/or services serve your customer's and client's needs and wants; when you're an investor, like Vince Lombardi said about "winning," "ROI isn't everything, it's the only thing."
What fuels this seemingly insurmountable gap?
As a neuroscientist, I often try to make sense of how people act in the world according to what's going on in their brains and minds. And something that is going on in everyone's minds is how neurochemistry can dictate their immediate behavior and values (their consistent behavior over time).
There is a continuum of neurochemicals in all of us that explain much of what we do and much of who we are that looks like this: Adrenaline -- Dopamine -- Serotonin -- Endorphin -- Oxytocin
The relevance to "business as usual" is that more and more people are becoming "adrenaline junkies" and getting those rushes flies at cross purposes with the other much more distant neurochemicals including and especially "doing the right thing" (something that only oxytocin cares about). For instance, a customer who just got the "deal of the century" in getting a product or service for next to nothing is going to get "high (interesting term) fives" from the people around them as opposed to a tepid reception if they came back and said, "Wow, I just got an incredibly fair deal on a product."
Now of course, for the customer to have made such a score, means less money to the company that they bought the product or service from. And less revenue to that company means less ROI to investors which is not going to go well with their adrenaline rush needs.
For investors, one of the greatest adrenaline rushes and one that they are still crowing about was to buy Google or more recently, Tesla, at their IPO price. For investors, their adrenalized bragging rights are not about, "I got the latest iPhone," but rather, "I bought Apple stock at $10/share in 2001."
The drive to experience an Adrenaline rush, be it as the conspicuously consuming customer buying the next thing to show off that they don't need, or the greedy investor eclipses the other four neurochemicals. People only bother with dopamine and endorphin and serotonin because solely riding the "Adrenaline Rush runaway train" can make life too chaotic and starts to trigger too much fear in other people (a.k.a. Charlie Sheen).
The greatest casuality of all seems to be oxytocin. Oxytocin is becoming less important and I would be interested if assays of it are showing a decline over the decades once mothers get past the first 18 months with an newborn child. Oxytocin is what underlies patience, tenderness, TLC (tender loving care) and perhaps most important, empathy. Oxytocin is what enables us to realize and accept that "love is a verb" and what you give others and not what you get from them. Without oxytocin our relationships lose their relating and turn into "arrangements" and projects to be managed. Oxytocin still survives in how grandparents feel toward grandchildren, how "loving" adults feel towards their aging parents and how dog owners feel about their dogs (they are after all, "Man's best friend" aren't they?).
I wish I could offer a solution to this dilemma in business as usual where Adrenaline Rushes win the day, but in the process create "zero sum games" in which everyone loses in the end.
Even those with the most toys at the end of their life aren’t happy. And I know that for a fact, because I crossed over into business after doing house calls to dying founders with lots of toys who felt they had blown it by focusing on the wrong things.
What would be your thoughts on this and suggestions? Or should I just start prescribing meds?